AFGHAN CIVILIAN DEATHS IN 2009 WERE MOST SINCE INVASION, UN SAYS
By Laura King
Reporting from Kabul, Afghanistan-- War's violence claimed the lives of
more than 2,400 Afghan civilians in 2009, the United Nations said
Wednesday, the largest annual death toll for noncombatants since the
U.S.-led invasion eight years ago.
But the proportion of
civilian deaths attributed to Western and Afghan security forces
dropped sharply in the wake of strict new rules of engagement issued in
the summer by U.S. Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the commander of
Western forces in Afghanistan.
Citing the public fury stirred up
by civilian deaths, and the resulting corrosive effect on the Western
war effort, McChrystal ordered troops to break off engagements with
insurgents if there was a risk of killing or injuring civilians, taking
only measures needed for self-defense.
Like the civilian deaths,
military fatalities reached record levels last year. On Wednesday,
military officials reported the deaths of four more American service
members and of a soldier from an undisclosed allied country.
Multiple
battlefield fatalities in a single day were once a relative rarity, but
Wednesday was the second day in a row that Western forces had reported
five military deaths.
The report by the human rights division of
the United Nations mission in Afghanistan illustrated the extraordinary
dangers faced by Afghan civilians in their daily lives. The overall
toll represented a 14% increase in war-related civilian fatalities from
2008.
In cities, towns and villages across the country, the pace
of suicide attacks and roadside bombings has accelerated steadily, and
ordinary activities such as driving to work or shopping in a street
market have become increasingly perilous.
The pattern of deaths
also mapped the reach and intensity of the conflict. Almost half of the
civilian fatalities occurred in a swath of the south, where the
insurgency is strongest and fighting has been fiercest. But violence
crept into some previously calm areas, such as the country's north.
Military
officials acknowledge that fighting is likely to escalate in coming
months with the arrival of about 30,000 more U.S. troops and an
additional 7,000 from North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies and
other countries. Some of the reinforcements will push into previously
insurgent-held areas, which will translate into more battlefield
activity, commanders have said.
Military officials have been
talking for several months about the decreasing instances of Western
troops mistakenly killing civilians, and the U.N. report appeared to
bear that out. It blamed insurgents for about 70% of the 2,412 recorded
deaths.
About 25% were attributed to Western or Afghan security
forces, and responsibility could not be determined in the other cases,
according to the report.
NATO commanders have maintained that
they take all possible measures to avoid harming noncombatants, and
accuse insurgents of not only killing indiscriminately but deliberately
placing civilians in harm's way by using populated areas as staging
grounds for attacks.
But the issue of civilian deaths has become
so sensitive that foreign forces are often blamed even for those deaths
in which the circumstances clearly implicate the Taliban and other
militant groups.
"International forces have to combat the
perception among many Afghans that they don't care if innocent people
suffer harm during military action," said Sarah Holewinski, the
executive director of the Washington-based Campaign for Innocent
Victims in Conflict, which works to obtain restitution for the families
of those who are killed and injured, or suffer property losses.
Both
sides are well aware that noncombatant deaths are a potent propaganda
tool. The Taliban leadership over the summer issued a code of conduct
urging fighters to try to avoid harming civilians. Western military
officials scoffed at the idea that the insurgents are taking serious
steps to protect noncombatants, but acknowledged that the Taliban may
be mirroring the allies' own counterinsurgency tenets.
Civilian
deaths are most common when suicide bombers try to strike Western
convoys or well-fortified government installations and military bases,
taking a devastating toll on unprotected bystanders.
But the
report noted that insurgents also target figures such as tribal elders
considered pro-government, or Afghan officials and even doctors and
teachers, accusing them of complicity with the West.
In previous
years, noncombatant deaths blamed on foreign forces were often the
result of airstrikes, now curtailed under McChrystal's rules of
engagement. Western commanders have also worked to train troops to find
nonlethal means of dealing with perceived threats, such as an Afghan
motorist who might be either preparing to ram a military convoy with
his explosives-filled vehicle, or simply driving carelessly.
laura.king@latimes.com
Link to article: http://mobile.latimes.com/inf/infomo?view=World+News+Item&feed:a=latimes_1min&feed:c=worldnews&feed:i=51614125&nopaging=1
|